2 examples from my schooling experiences that reflected effective or ineffective literacy instruction for speakers of non-standard dialects: My teachers always corrected students who would say "ain't." It was not allowed in the classroom. We were always supposed to speak with proper grammar. During another school experience the students who spoke with a dialect were constantly being corrected. During all of my school, no one ever encouraged the use of contrastive analysis. Students were never allowed to speak without proper grammar.
1 relationship between the strategies for the teaching of literacy presented in this article and inclusive practices: The strategies presented in this article encourage students to be themselves, to talk in their dialect without correction. Teachers want the students to feel comfortable to talk in their dialect in the classroom. In contrastive analysis, they find similarities and differences in the two languages. I think this relates to inclusive practices because we, as teachers, want to find similarities between all of the students. Whether it's their dialect or special needs that sets children apart, we want to include everyone to feel comfortable to be themselves in the classroom.
Honoring Dialect in the Classroom
Citations:
Epstein, P., & Herring-Harris, L. (2011, September 15). Honoring dialect and increasing student performance in standard english. Retrieved from http://www.nwp.org/cs/public/print/resource/3655
Good connection to Inclusive practices!
ReplyDelete